%2C_Bestanddeelnr_929-0811_(cropped).jpg?width=300)
Prime Minister of India (1966-1977; 1980-1984)
Missing: 2, 4, 5, 6, 8. Present digits repeat to show how many times they occur.
Three is the number of expression — the point at which a thing becomes shareable. Tradition links it to language, humour, performance and the ability to make an idea land. It is generally read as the most immediately likeable number, and the reading usually adds a warning in the same breath: fluency can outrun substance, and 3 is described as capable of talking its way past work it has not actually done.
Concentrated self-direction. Read as conviction that does not need external agreement — and does not always seek it.
Read as bluntness: reaching the conclusion without the intermediate handling. The tradition frames this as a timing gap rather than a lack of feeling.
Read as impatience with structure and maintenance. Associated with starting well and leaving the scaffolding to someone else.
The centre of the grid, so its absence is weighted heavily. Read as difficulty adapting mid-course — a preference for the plan already chosen over the plan now indicated.
Read as a complicated relationship with obligation — either avoiding it or over-shouldering it, rarely a settled middle.
Read as discomfort with power and money — not incapacity, but an unwillingness to claim authority openly.
Moolank 1 comes from the day of the month alone; Bhagyank 3 from the whole date. They differ, which is the ordinary case — the two numbers answer different questions.
The Sun. Authority, visibility, the self as centre. Read as leadership that is seen.
Bhagyank uses the same arithmetic as the Western life path, so the two will always agree. That is not two traditions confirming each other — it is one calculation under two names.
We admired Dr. King. We felt his loss as our own. The tragedy rekindled memories of the great martyrs of all time who gave their lives so that men might live and grow. We thought of the great men in your own country who fell to the assassin's bullet and of Mahatma Gandhi's martyrdom here in this city, this very month, twenty-one years ago. Such events remain as wounds in the human consciousness, reminding us of battles, yet to be fought and tasks still to be accomplished. We should not mourn for men of high ideals. Rather we should rejoice that we had the privilege of having had them with us, to inspire us by their radiant personalities.
The great need in the world today is for for nations to so define their national interest that it makes for greater harmony, greater equality and justice and greater stability in the world.
We believe in freedom with a passion that only those who have been denied it for so long can understand it, We believe in equality because so many in our nation have been denied for so long, we believe in human worth for that is the basis for all our current work in India.
A nation's strength ultimately consists in what it can do on its own, and not in what it can borrow from others.
India wants to avoid a war at all costs but it is not a one-sided affair, you cannot shake hands with a clenched fist.
There are grave misgivings that the discussion on ecology may be designed to distract attention from the problems of war and poverty.
Sourced from Wikiquote, restricted to the subject’s own sourced sections.