
British actress, singer and author (born 1935)
Missing: 4, 6, 7, 8. Present digits repeat to show how many times they occur.
Where 1 divides, 2 relates. The tradition assigns this number to partnership, timing and the kind of perception that notices a shift in mood before anyone names it. It is read as the diplomat’s number. Its difficulty is that the sensitivity which makes the reading possible does not switch off, so 2 is described as absorbing tension that was never theirs to hold.
A complete line in the grid.
The 1-5-9 diagonal complete. Read as determination that survives the middle of a project, when the initial energy has gone and the result is not yet visible.
Concentrated self-direction. Read as conviction that does not need external agreement — and does not always seek it.
Read as impatience with structure and maintenance. Associated with starting well and leaving the scaffolding to someone else.
Read as a complicated relationship with obligation — either avoiding it or over-shouldering it, rarely a settled middle.
Read as reluctance to sit with an unresolved question. Associated with wanting the working answer rather than the true one.
Read as discomfort with power and money — not incapacity, but an unwillingness to claim authority openly.
Moolank 1 comes from the day of the month alone; Bhagyank 2 from the whole date. They differ, which is the ordinary case — the two numbers answer different questions.
The Sun. Authority, visibility, the self as centre. Read as leadership that is seen.
Bhagyank uses the same arithmetic as the Western life path, so the two will always agree. That is not two traditions confirming each other — it is one calculation under two names.
Life is Supercalifragilisticexpialidocius.
Success is terrifying. Like happiness, it is often appreciated in retrospect. It's only later that you place it in perspective. Years from now, I'll look back and say, "God, wasn't it wonderful?
Hopefully, I brought people a certain joy. That will be a wonderful legacy.
That's All Folks!
Can I give them what they think they're going to get from me? That's always the big question.
I saw The Sound of Music again recently, and I loved it. Probably it's a more valuable film now than when it first came out, because some of the things it stood for have already disappeared. There's a kind of naive loveliness about it, and love goes by so fast … love and music and happiness and family, that's what it's all about. I believe in these things. It would be awful not to, wouldn't it?
Sourced from Wikiquote, restricted to the subject’s own sourced sections.