Carol Greider
American molecular biologist
The numbers
2 + 7 = 9
Lo Shu grid
Missing: 3, 8. Present digits repeat to show how many times they occur.
Life path 9 — The Humanitarian
Nine completes the cycle, and the tradition treats it as the number that has already been round once: broad, forgiving, oriented toward something larger than a single life. It is read as the number of the reformer and the artist. Its tension is the mirror of 6 — where 6 over-gives to the people in front of it, 9 is described as giving to humanity in general while the people in front of it wait.
Complete lines
Line of Reason
A complete line in the grid.
Line of Stability
A complete line in the grid.
Line of Resolve
The 1-5-9 diagonal complete. Read as determination that survives the middle of a project, when the initial energy has gone and the result is not yet visible.
Cooperation
A complete line in the grid.
Care
A complete line in the grid.
Repeated numbers
1 appears 3 times
Concentrated self-direction. Read as conviction that does not need external agreement — and does not always seek it.
What is missing
Missing 3
Read as difficulty getting the inner picture out — the thought is complete, the expression lags. Often described in people whose written voice is far stronger than their spoken one.
Missing 8
Read as discomfort with power and money — not incapacity, but an unwillingness to claim authority openly.
Vedic — Ank Jyotish
Moolank 6 comes from the day of the month alone; Bhagyank 9 from the whole date. They differ, which is the ordinary case — the two numbers answer different questions.
Shukra
Venus. Art, pleasure, relationship. Read as attraction and aesthetic sense.
Bhagyank uses the same arithmetic as the Western life path, so the two will always agree. That is not two traditions confirming each other — it is one calculation under two names.
In their words
I learned many important lessons that first year after the initial discovery. Mostly, I learned the importance of questioning your own assumptions. We did not set out to prove we had a new , rather we imagined all the ways our own thinking could be deceiving us and allowing us to interpret our results in a way that favored our bias. I learned that getting the correct answer is more important than getting an answer you might hope for. I learned to step aside from myself and view my data through the eyes of a skeptic. We worked for a year before we convinced ourselves that the telomere terminal transferase was indeed a unique activity. The initial discovery was in December of 1984 and the paper was published in in December 1985.
... sometimes you can't know what is most interesting to you until you're actually in the environment.
The function of s in terms of this protective cap — that's what and Barbara McClintock showed … Muller was working in ' and McClintock in corn or maize … there must be something protective at the end, because when you break that chromosome end … you get the chromosome is either degraded or it will fuse with other chromosomes. So they were the first to functionally define the telomere as we just described it. And then it was in the 1970s that Elizabeth Blackburn, working together with , showed the molecular characteristics of the telomere. So they defined the actual DNA sequence at the time. Then understanding that molecular characteristic, we could then go forward and ask questions about how the end of the telomere is maintained.
… this is something that I talk to students about often ... when you have something that's new and exciting, rather than saying, oh, I want to find evidence to support my hypothesis — instead, we tried to bash down our own hypothesis. And to find way to knock it down, to find out, how could this possibly be wrong? Because I would rather disprove my own crazy idea than have somebody else disprove it.
Sourced from Wikiquote, restricted to the subject’s own sourced sections.