.jpg?width=300)
Demis Hassabis
British artificial intelligence researcher (born 1976)
The numbers
3 + 9 = 12
1 + 2 = 3
Lo Shu grid
Missing: 4, 5, 8. Present digits repeat to show how many times they occur.
Life path 3 — The Communicator
Three is the number of expression — the point at which a thing becomes shareable. Tradition links it to language, humour, performance and the ability to make an idea land. It is generally read as the most immediately likeable number, and the reading usually adds a warning in the same breath: fluency can outrun substance, and 3 is described as capable of talking its way past work it has not actually done.
Complete lines
Line of Action
The 8-1-6 row complete. Read as follow-through — the traditional marker of someone whose plans reliably become events.
Line of Expression
A complete line in the grid.
Care
A complete line in the grid.
Repeated numbers
7 appears 3 times
Concentrated inwardness. Read as a mind that prefers its own company and pays a social price for it.
What is missing
Missing 4
Read as impatience with structure and maintenance. Associated with starting well and leaving the scaffolding to someone else.
Missing 5
The centre of the grid, so its absence is weighted heavily. Read as difficulty adapting mid-course — a preference for the plan already chosen over the plan now indicated.
Missing 8
Read as discomfort with power and money — not incapacity, but an unwillingness to claim authority openly.
Vedic — Ank Jyotish
Moolank 9 comes from the day of the month alone; Bhagyank 3 from the whole date. They differ, which is the ordinary case — the two numbers answer different questions.
Mangal
Mars. Force, conflict, courage, blood. Read as energy that must be aimed at something.
Bhagyank uses the same arithmetic as the Western life path, so the two will always agree. That is not two traditions confirming each other — it is one calculation under two names.
In their words
Step one, solve intelligence; step two, use it to solve everything else.
For the first time in human history we wouldn't be resource constrained. And I think that could be amazing new era for humanity where it's not zero-sum, right? I have this land, you don't have it. Or if the tigers have their forest, then the local villages can't, what are they going to use? I think that this will help a lot. No, it won't solve all problems because there's still other human foibles that will still exist, but it will at least remove one, I think one of the big vectors, which is scarcity of resources, including land and more materials and energy.
And we should ... call it ... this kind of radical abundance era, where there's plenty of resources to go around. Of course the next big question is making sure that that's fairly, shared fairly and everyone in society benefits from that.
I think some of the biggest problems that face us today as a society, whether that's climate or disease, will be helped by AI solutions. I'd be very worried about society today if I didn't know that something as transformative as AI was coming down the line.
Sourced from Wikiquote, restricted to the subject’s own sourced sections.