.jpg?width=300)
Australian actor and producer (born 1969)
Missing: 2, 7. Present digits repeat to show how many times they occur.
Eight is the number of material consequence — authority, money, scale, the machinery that makes things actually happen. Tradition reads it as unusually comfortable with leverage and unusually clear-eyed about what things cost. It carries the sharpest warning of the nine: 8 is described as the number most able to build something large and most able to be consumed by it, with the reading turning on whether the power is aimed at anything beyond itself.
The 8-1-6 row complete. Read as follow-through — the traditional marker of someone whose plans reliably become events.
A complete line in the grid.
The 1-5-9 diagonal complete. Read as determination that survives the middle of a project, when the initial energy has gone and the result is not yet visible.
A complete line in the grid.
A complete line in the grid.
Read as bluntness: reaching the conclusion without the intermediate handling. The tradition frames this as a timing gap rather than a lack of feeling.
Read as reluctance to sit with an unresolved question. Associated with wanting the working answer rather than the true one.
Moolank 5 comes from the day of the month alone; Bhagyank 8 from the whole date. They differ, which is the ordinary case — the two numbers answer different questions.
Mercury. Intellect, commerce, speech. Read as quickness and adaptability.
Bhagyank uses the same arithmetic as the Western life path, so the two will always agree. That is not two traditions confirming each other — it is one calculation under two names.
If I had my way, if I was lucky enough, if I could be on the brink my entire life — that great sense of expectation and excitement without the disappointment — that would be the perfect state.
Thank you of course to Miss Hepburn. The longevity of her career I think is inspiring to everyone. But most importantly and on behalf of everyone I know in The Aviator, thank you to Martin Scorsese. I hope my son will marry your daughter.
As random and as subjective as this award is, it means a great deal in a year of extraordinary, yet again, extraordinary performances by women ... And perhaps those of us in the industry who are still foolishly clinging to the idea that female films with women at the center are niche experiences. They are not. Audiences want to see them, and in fact, they earn money. The world is round, people.
Well, I'm a product of the Australian film industry which by its very nature is independent, sometimes for better sometimes for worse. I suppose the collaborative nature of being independent is what feels natural to me, and when people talk about working in Hollywood I don't quite know what that means. Being part of the Indiana Jones franchise and The Lord of the Rings, that felt more like a departure for me. But in the end, I think the whole notion of the independent spirit is not just about the way a film is financed but about the creative thinking behind it, and sometimes that can exist in the mainstream; those sensibilities can cross over and audiences are interested in, not a homogenous way of storytelling but a diverse way of receiving a narrative.
I think marriage is all about timing. Getting married is insanity; I mean, it's a risk – who knows if you're going to be together forever? But you both say, 'We're going to take this chance, in the same spirit.
What interested me was how much of a departure this was in that you have three interesting, across the generations, female characters, literally riding alongside the male characters. Also the emotional and psychological depth of the characters was, for me, a lot richer than I've seen in a western. But never once did it sacrifice the thrill of the chase. So it was a journey into the unknown for me.
Sourced from Wikiquote, restricted to the subject’s own sourced sections.