W. V. D. Hodge is Michael Atiyah’s student of · compatibility reading
| Complementary gaps4 gaps covered: Michael Atiyah lacks 3, 6, 7; W. V. D. Hodge lacks 4. | +28 / 30 |
| Shared strengthsNo complete line in common. | 0 / 18 |
| Life-path fit2 and 9 come from different groups — the 2-4-8 group (practical, structural) and the 3-6-9 group (expressive, outward-facing). Read as friction that can be productive. | +8 / 20 |
| Graha relationMoolank 4 and 8 are read as friendly in Ank Jyotish. Schools disagree here more than anywhere else in numerology. | +16 / 16 |
| Shared blind spotsBoth missing 5, 8. Tradition reads a shared gap as the thing neither person will notice going wrong. | -6 penalty |
Complementary gaps are weighted above shared traits on purpose: Lo Shu practice looks for what one chart supplies to the other, not for sameness. Two identical charts share every strength and every blind spot.
Read as transmission: whether the teacher’s completed lines cover the student’s gaps.
The clearest thing in these two charts is what each one covers for the other: W. V. D. Hodge carries 3, 6, 7, which Michael Atiyah’s date does not contain; Michael Atiyah carries 4, which W. V. D. Hodge’s does not. In Lo Shu practice this is the reading that matters most — not shared traits, but supplied ones.
Both are missing 5, 8. A shared gap is read as the failure mode neither person spots, because it looks normal to both of them.
Michael Atiyah alone completes Cooperation; W. V. D. Hodge alone completes Line of Action, Line of Expression, Care.
Life paths 2 and 9 come from different groups. Tradition reads cross-group pairs as effortful and, where the effort is made, durable.
| Michael Atiyah | W. V. D. Hodge | |
| Life path | 2 | 9 |
| Moolank | 4 | 8 |
| Missing | 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 | 4, 5, 8 |
| Complete lines | Cooperation | Line of Action, Line of Expression, Care |
Both missing 5, 8 — visible as dashed cells in the same position on both grids.